EaldoWiki

The official Wiki for the Kingdom of Ealdormere

User Tools

Site Tools


scaism:man_at_arms

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revisionPrevious revision
Next revision
Previous revision
scaism:man_at_arms [2022/09/08 21:41] Dietrich von Sachsenscaism:man_at_arms [2024/04/17 17:15] (current) Dietrich von Sachsen
Line 2: Line 2:
 A **Man-at-Arms** (referring to nobles of all genders; some individuals may prefer Lady-at-Arms or Noble-at-Arms) is an armoured combatant who is a dependent of another armoured combatant. In many cases, Men-at-Arms fulfill the same role as a squire, as it is a personal relationship between the master and the Man-at-Arms. Some require fealty or service of their Men-at-Arms, while others view the relationship as a declaration of mutual inspiration. As with all such relationships, it varies. A **Man-at-Arms** (referring to nobles of all genders; some individuals may prefer Lady-at-Arms or Noble-at-Arms) is an armoured combatant who is a dependent of another armoured combatant. In many cases, Men-at-Arms fulfill the same role as a squire, as it is a personal relationship between the master and the Man-at-Arms. Some require fealty or service of their Men-at-Arms, while others view the relationship as a declaration of mutual inspiration. As with all such relationships, it varies.
  
-Unlike [[squire|Squires]], who are exclusively dependents of a member of the [[awards:order_of_the_chivalry|Order of the Chivalry]], a Man-at-Arms can be taken by a fighter of any rank. In some lands, Men-at-Arms are often in the employ of a [[squire]], who is in turn in the employ of a [[knight]]. By the same token, there is a tradition with some Knights, who were never themselves taken as a Squire, to take Men-at-Arms instead. Yet other knights will take someone as a Man-at-Arms for a period of time as a trial run before squiring him or her.+Unlike [[squire|Squires]], who are exclusively dependents of a member of the [[awards:order_of_the_chivalry|Order of the Chivalry]], a Man-at-Arms can be taken by a fighter of any rank. In some lands, Men-at-Arms are often in the employ of a [[squire]], who is in turn in the employ of a [[knight]]. By the same token, there is a tradition with some Knights, who were never themselves taken as a Squire, to take Men-at-Arms instead. Yet other knights will take someone as a Man-at-Arms for a period of time as a trial run before squiring them.
  
 If there can be said to be any consistent requirement for taking a man-at-arms, it is that the master should be a skilled enough fighter to be able to teach said Man-at-Arms in armoured combat - but even this is only a guideline. If there can be said to be any consistent requirement for taking a man-at-arms, it is that the master should be a skilled enough fighter to be able to teach said Man-at-Arms in armoured combat - but even this is only a guideline.
Line 11: Line 11:
 ===== Symbols ===== ===== Symbols =====
 Men-at-Arms are marked by the wearing of a [[scaism:sumptuary_law|blue belt]]. Men-at-Arms are marked by the wearing of a [[scaism:sumptuary_law|blue belt]].
 +
 +===== See Also =====
 +  * [[people:men_at_arms:start|Men-at-Arms in Ealdormere]]
scaism/man_at_arms.1662673319.txt.gz · Last modified: 2023/03/27 22:12 (external edit)

Donate Powered by PHP Valid HTML5 Valid CSS Driven by DokuWiki